ReviewNeurosurgical review2024
Letter to the editor: fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a clinical study and analysis.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm Among Neurosurgeons: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive analysis of microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery as a treatment option for hemifacial spasm (HFS). Beginning with a thorough literature review, it explores the historical context, prevalence, and underlying mechanisms of HFS, laying a robust foundation for discussing MVD. Various surgical techniques, from traditional microscopic to fully endoscopic approaches, are described, along with their procedural nuances and advantages. Clinical data, including patient demographics and surgical success rates, substantiate the efficacy of MVD in alleviating HFS symptoms. The discussion of postoperative complications provides valuable insights into practical challenges. However, limitations such as single-center design, lack of robust statistical analysis, and absence of comparative data between endoscopic and microscopic approaches diminish the article's potential impact. Recommendations for multicenter collaborations, enhanced statistical analyses, comparative studies, and discussions on surgical training could significantly enhance the article's contribution to neurosurgery practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38413453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.