Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38413010›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

When Data Are Lacking: Physics-Based Inverse Design of Biopolymers Interacting with Complex, Fluid Phases.

Jeroen Methorst, Niek van Hilten, Art Hoti, Kai Steffen Stroh, Herre Jelger Risselada

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeroen MethorstLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-4882
Niek van HiltenLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1204-2489
Art HotiLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kai Steffen StrohDepartment of Physics, Technische Universität Dortmund, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Herre Jelger RisseladaLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1410-6570
Leiden University · NLTU Dortmund University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular research traditionally revolves around comprehending the mechanisms through which peptides or proteins facilitate specific functions, often driven by their relevance to clinical ailments. This conventional approach assumes that unraveling mechanisms is a prerequisite for wielding control over functionality, which stands as the ultimate research goal. However, an alternative perspective emerges from physics-based inverse design, shifting the focus from mechanisms to the direct acquisition of functional control strategies. By embracing this methodology, we can uncover solutions that might not have direct parallels in natural systems, yet yield crucial insights into the isolated molecular elements dictating functionality. This provides a distinctive comprehension of the underlying mechanisms.In this context, we elucidate how physics-based inverse design, facilitated by evolutionary algorithms and coarse-grained molecular simulations, charts a promising course for innovating the reverse engineering of biopolymers interacting with intricate fluid phases such as lipid membranes and liquid protein phases. We introduce evolutionary molecular dynamics (Evo-MD) simulations, an approach that merges evolutionary algorithms with the Martini coarse-grained force field. This method directs the evolutionary process from random amino acid sequences toward peptides interacting with complex fluid phases such as biological lipid membranes, offering significant promises in the development of peptide-based sensors and drugs. This approach can be tailored to recognize or selectively target specific attributes such as membrane curvature, lipid composition, membrane phase (e.g., lipid rafts), and protein fluid phases. Although the resulting optimal solutions may not perfectly align with biological norms, physics-based inverse design excels at isolating relevant physicochemical principles and thermodynamic driving forces governing optimal biopolymer interaction within complex fluidic environments. In addition, we expound upon how physics-based evolution using the Evo-MD approach can be harnessed to extract the evolutionary optimization fingerprints of protein-lipid interactions from native proteins. Finally, we outline how such an approach is uniquely able to generate strategic training data for predictive neural network models that cover the whole relevant physicochemical domain. Exploring challenges, we address key considerations such as choosing a fitting fitness function to delineate the desired functionality. Additionally, we scrutinize assumptions tied to system setup, the targeted protein structure, and limitations posed by the utilized (coarse-grained) force fields and explore potential strategies for guiding evolution with limited experimental data. This discourse encapsulates the potential and remaining obstacles of physics-based inverse design, paving the way for an exciting frontier in biomolecular research.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationPhysicsBiopolymersLipidsPeptidesThermodynamicsBiopolymersLipidsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID38413010
PMCPMC10938504
OpenAlexW4392234443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.