ArticleAging2024
Unlocking the potential of senescence-related gene signature as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in sepsis: insights from meta-analyses, single-cell RNA sequencing, and
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of a robust sepsis prognostic classifier based on E3 ubiquitin ligase-related genes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Investigating the Prognostic Role of Telomerase-Related Cellular Senescence Gene Signatures in Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Identification of Prognostic Genes Related to Cell Senescence and Lipid Metabolism in Glioblastoma Based on Transcriptome and Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based identification of leptin-associated biomarkers and prognostic prediction models in sepsis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular senescence is closely associated with the pathogenesis of sepsis. However, the diagnostic and prognostic value of senescence-related genes remain unclear. In this study, 866 senescence-related genes were collected from CellAge. The training cohort, GSE65682, which included 42 control and 760 sepsis samples, was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Feature selection was performed using gene expression difference detection, LASSO analysis, random forest, and Cox regression. TGFBI and MAD1L1 were ultimately selected for inclusion in the multivariate Cox regression model. Clustering based on the expressions of TGFBI and MAD1L1 was significantly associated with sepsis characteristics and prognoses (all P < 0.05). The risk signature served as a reliable prognostic predictor across the GSE65682, GSE95233, and GSE4607 cohorts (pooled hazard ratio = 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.63-11.17). Furthermore, it also served as a robust classifier to distinguish sepsis samples from control cases across 14 cohorts (pooled odds ratio = 5.88; 95% CI = 3.54-9.77). Single-cell RNA sequencing analyses from five healthy controls and four sepsis subjects indicated that the risk signature could reflect the senescence statuses of monocytes and B cells; this finding was then experimentally validated in THP-1 and IM-9 cells
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.