Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38412307›Full record

ArticleEpidemiologic reviews2024

Instruments for racial health equity: a scoping review of structural racism measurement, 2019-2021.

Anna K Hing, Tongtan Chantarat, Shekinah Fashaw-Walters, Shanda L Hunt, Rachel R Hardeman

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiologic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
45.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Conceptualizing and Measuring Systemic Racism.Annual review of public health · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna K HingDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Tongtan ChantaratDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-4391
Shekinah Fashaw-WaltersDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Shanda L HuntUniversity Libraries, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rachel R HardemanDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Evidence for Action 79238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress toward racial health equity cannot be made if we cannot measure its fundamental driver: structural racism. As in other epidemiologic studies, the first step is to measure the exposure. But how to measure structural racism is an ongoing debate. To characterize the approaches epidemiologists and other health researchers use to quantitatively measure structural racism, highlight methodological innovations, and identify gaps in the literature, we conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed and gray literature published during 2019-2021 to accompany the 2018 published work of Groos et al., in which they surveyed the scope of structural racism measurement up to 2017. We identified several themes from the recent literature: the current predominant focus on measuring anti-Black racism; using residential segregation as well as other segregation-driven measures as proxies of structural racism; measuring structural racism as spatial exposures; increasing calls by epidemiologists and other health researchers to measure structural racism as a multidimensional, multilevel determinant of health and related innovations; the development of policy databases; the utility of simulated counterfactual approaches in the understanding of how structural racism drives racial health inequities; and the lack of measures of antiracism and limited work on later life effects. Our findings sketch out several steps to improve the science related to structural racism measurements, which is key to advancing antiracism policies.

Indexed as

Health EquityHumansRacismSystemic Racismhealth equitymeasurementstructural racism

Identifiers

PMID38412307
PMCPMC11405678
OpenAlexW4392189012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.