Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38412198›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Classification of pleasantness of wind by electroencephalography.

Yasuhisa Maruyama, Ryuto Nakamura, Shota Tsuji, Yingli Xuan, Kunio Mizutani, Tsubasa Okaze, Natsue Yoshimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yasuhisa MaruyamaSchool of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3523-1215
Ryuto NakamuraSchool of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Shota TsujiSchool of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Yingli XuanFaculty of Engineering, Tokyo Polytechnic University, Atsugi, Japan.
Kunio MizutaniFaculty of Engineering, Tokyo Polytechnic University, Atsugi, Japan.
Tsubasa OkazeSchool of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7024-5511
Natsue YoshimuraSchool of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal comfort of humans depends on the surrounding environment and affects their productivity. Several environmental factors, such as air temperature, relative humidity, wind or airflow, and radiation, have considerable influence on the thermal comfort or pleasantness; hence, these are generally controlled by electrical devices. Lately, the development of objective measurement methods for thermal comfort or pleasantness using physiological signals is receiving attention to realize a personalized comfortable environment through the automatic control of electrical devices. In this study, we focused on electroencephalography (EEG) and investigated whether EEG signals contain information related to the pleasantness of ambient airflow reproducing natural wind fluctuations using machine learning methods. In a hot and humid artificial climate chamber, we measured EEG signals while the participants were exposed to airflow at four different velocities. Based on the reported pleasantness levels, we performed within-participant classification from the source activity of the EEG and obtained a classification accuracy higher than the chance level using both linear and nonlinear support vector machine classifiers as well as an artificial neural network. The results of this study showed that EEG is useful in identifying people's transient pleasantness when exposed to wind.

Indexed as

ThermosensingWindClimateElectroencephalographyHumansTemperature

Identifiers

PMID38412198
PMCPMC10898722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.