ArticlePLOS global public health2024
The quality of medicines for the prevention and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality of medicines for the prevention and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy globally is a critical challenge in the reduction of maternal mortality rate. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of available studies on the quality of the eight medicines recommended globally for the prevention and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We searched five electronic databases- Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest and Cochrane Library, and also grey literature, without year or language limitations. Any study assessing the quality parameters (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, pH, sterility, solubility, impurities) of medicines by using any valid laboratory methods was eligible. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data and applied Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines tool for quality assessment. Results were narratively reported and stratified by the drug types. Of 5669 citations screened, 33 studies from 27 countries were included. Five studies reported on the quality of magnesium sulphate-two (Nigeria and USA) found substandard medicine due to failing API specification and contaminants, respectively. Another study from Nigeria and a multi-country study (10 lower-middle- and low-income countries) found poor-quality due to failing the pH criteria. Seven of eight studies evaluating aspirin found quality issues, including degraded medicines in five studies (Brazil, USA, Yugoslavia and Pakistan). Five studies of calcium supplements found quality issues, particularly heavy metal contamination. Of 15 antihypertensives quality studies, 12 found substandard medicines and one study identified counterfeit medicines. This systematic review identified pervasive issues of poor-quality medicines across all recommended medicines used to prevent or treat hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, raising concerns regarding their safety and effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.