ArticleThe ISME journal2024
Gut microbiota contribute to variations in honey bee foraging intensity.
Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- An engineered bacterial symbiont maps micron-scale sugar gradients in the honeybee gut.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Biogeographic and Habitat-Associated Variation in the Gut Microbiota of the Stingless BeeInsects · 2026Article
- Analysis of Amino Acid, Vitamin, and Mineral Content in Chinese Gallnut (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DietaryInsects · 2026Article
- Review
- Bacterial-archaeal co-occurrence in honey bee gut microbiomes across host species and management regimes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Inferring plant-bee-microbe associations: Foragers, hive workers, and honey tell complementary stories.PloS one · 2026Article
- Seasonal dynamics of the gut microbiota inFrontiers in insect science · 2026Article
- Article
- Isolation, Molecular Identification, and Enzymatic Activity of Microorganisms Associated with the Gut of Stingless Bees Tetragonisca angustula Latreille, 1811.Neotropical entomology · 2025Article
- Selection of Probiotics for Honey Bees: The In Vitro Inhibition ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Life history strategies complement niche partitioning to support the coexistence of closely related Gilliamella species in the bee gut.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Longitudinal dynamics of intestinal bacteria in the life cycle and their effects on growth and development of potato tuber moth.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The gut microbiome differs between hygiene-performing and non-hygiene-performing worker honey bees.Insectes sociaux · 2025Article
- Article
- Possible interactions between gut microbiome and division of labor in honey bees.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Cross-feeding of bifidobacteria promotes intestinal homeostasis: a lifelong perspective on the host health.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gut microbiomes are increasingly recognized for mediating diverse biological aspects of their hosts, including complex behavioral phenotypes. Although many studies have reported that experimental disruptions to the gut microbial community result in atypical host behavior, studies that address how gut microbes contribute to adaptive behavioral trait variation are rare. Eusocial insects represent a powerful model to test this, because of their simple gut microbiota and complex division of labor characterized by colony-level variation in behavioral phenotypes. Although previous studies report correlational differences in gut microbial community associated with division of labor, here, we provide evidence that gut microbes play a causal role in defining differences in foraging behavior between European honey bees (Apis mellifera). We found that gut microbial community structure differed between hive-based nurse bees and bees that leave the hive to forage for floral resources. These differences were associated with variation in the abundance of individual microbes, including Bifidobacterium asteroides, Bombilactobacillus mellis, and Lactobacillus melliventris. Manipulations of colony demography and individual foraging experience suggested that differences in gut microbial community composition were associated with task experience. Moreover, single-microbe inoculations with B. asteroides, B. mellis, and L. melliventris caused effects on foraging intensity. These results demonstrate that gut microbes contribute to division of labor in a social insect, and support a role of gut microbes in modulating host behavioral trait variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.