ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2024
Leveraging Brain Modularity Prior for Interpretable Representation Learning of fMRI.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperbolic Kernel Graph Neural Networks for Neurocognitive Decline Analysis From Multimodal Brain Imaging.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2026Article
- Multimodal MRI Radiomics and Machine Learning Identify Node-Level Structural and Functional Alterations in HIV-Associated Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-atlas neuroimaging data for robust biomarker identification in neuropsychiatric disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Self-supervised graph contrastive learning with diffusion augmentation for functional MRI analysis and brain disorder detection.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Functional and Structural Network Alterations in HIV-Associated Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Disorders: Evidence for Functional Disruptions Preceding Structural Changes.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
- ACTION: Augmentation and computation toolbox for brain network analysis with functional MRI.NeuroImage · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) can reflect spontaneous neural activities in the brain and is widely used for brain disorder analysis. Previous studies focus on extracting fMRI representations using machine/deep learning methods, but these features typically lack biological interpretability. The human brain exhibits a remarkable modular structure in spontaneous brain functional networks, with each module comprised of functionally interconnected brain regions-of-interest (ROIs). However, existing learning-based methods cannot adequately utilize such brain modularity prior. In this paper, we propose a brain modularity-constrained dynamic representation learning framework for interpretable fMRI analysis, consisting of dynamic graph construction, dynamic graph learning via a novel modularity-constrained graph neural network (MGNN), and prediction and biomarker detection. The designed MGNN is constrained by three core neurocognitive modules (i.e., salience network, central executive network, and default mode network), encouraging ROIs within the same module to share similar representations. To further enhance discriminative ability of learned features, we encourage the MGNN to preserve network topology of input graphs via a graph topology reconstruction constraint. Experimental results on 534 subjects with rs-fMRI scans from two datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The identified discriminative brain ROIs and functional connectivities can be regarded as potential fMRI biomarkers to aid in clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.