Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411960›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Socioeconomic Status, Palliative Care, and Death at Home Among Patients With Cancer Before and During COVID-19.

Javaid Iqbal, Rahim Moineddin, Robert A Fowler, Monika K Krzyzanowska, Christopher M Booth, James Downar, Jenny Lau, Lisa W Le, Gary Rodin, Hsien Seow and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel Systemic Anticancer Treatments and Health Services Use at the End of Life Among Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Javaid IqbalDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert A FowlerInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monika K KrzyzanowskaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher M BoothDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
James DownarDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jenny LauDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa W LeDepartment of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gary RodinDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hsien SeowDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Peter TanuseputroDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Craig C EarleDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kieran L QuinnDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Breffni HannonDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Camilla ZimmermannDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CABruyère · CAMcMaster University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the delivery of cancer care, but less is known about its association with place of death and delivery of specialized palliative care (SPC) and potential disparities in these outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with death at home and SPC delivery at the end of life and to examine whether disparities in socioeconomic status exist for these outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, an interrupted time series analysis was conducted using Ontario Cancer Registry data comprising adult patients aged 18 years or older who died with cancer between the pre-COVID-19 (March 16, 2015, to March 15, 2020) and COVID-19 (March 16, 2020, to March 15, 2021) periods. The data analysis was performed between March and November 2023. Exposure: COVID-19-related hospital restrictions starting March 16, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were death at home and SPC delivery at the end of life (last 30 days before death). Socioeconomic status was measured using Ontario Marginalization Index area-based material deprivation quintiles, with quintile 1 (Q1) indicating the least deprivation; Q3, intermediate deprivation; and Q5, the most deprivation. Segmented linear regression was used to estimate monthly trends in outcomes before, at the start of, and in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Of 173 915 patients in the study cohort (mean [SD] age, 72.1 [12.5] years; males, 54.1% [95% CI, 53.8%-54.3%]), 83.7% (95% CI, 83.6%-83.9%) died in the pre-COVID-19 period and 16.3% (95% CI, 16.1%-16.4%) died in the COVID-19 period, 54.5% (95% CI, 54.2%-54.7%) died at home during the entire study period, and 57.8% (95% CI, 57.5%-58.0%) received SPC at the end of life. In March 2020, home deaths increased by 8.3% (95% CI, 7.4%-9.1%); however, this increase was less marked in Q5 (6.1%; 95% CI, 4.4%-7.8%) than in Q1 (11.4%; 95% CI, 9.6%-13.2%) and Q3 (10.0%; 95% CI, 9.0%-11.1%). There was a simultaneous decrease of 5.3% (95% CI, -6.3% to -4.4%) in the rate of SPC at the end of life, with no significant difference among quintiles. Patients who received SPC at the end of life (vs no SPC) were more likely to die at home before and during the pandemic. However, there was a larger immediate increase in home deaths among those who received no SPC at the end of life vs those who received SPC (Q1, 17.5% [95% CI, 15.2%-19.8%] vs 7.6% [95% CI, 5.4%-9.7%]; Q3, 12.7% [95% CI, 10.8%-14.5%] vs 9.0% [95% CI, 7.2%-10.7%]). For Q5, the increase in home deaths was significant only for patients who did not receive SPC (13.9% [95% CI, 11.9%-15.8%] vs 1.2% [95% CI, -1.0% to 3.5%]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with amplified socioeconomic disparities in death at home and SPC delivery at the end of life. Future research should focus on the mechanisms of these disparities and on developing interventions to ensure equitable and consistent SPC access.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesDeathHumansMalePalliative CarePandemicsSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID38411960
PMCPMC10900963
OpenAlexW4392190264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.