ArticleJAMA network open2024
Routine Fecal Occult Blood Screening and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Sweden.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Colorectal Cancer Screening Via Fecal Occult Blood Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing versus usual care in diagnostic colorectal cancer screening: the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Variation in fecal hemoglobin concentrations: Cross-sectional analysis of a screening trial and a screening program in Sweden.Journal of medical screening · 2026Trial
- Derivation and Validation of Charlson, Elixhauser and RxRisk Cost-Based Comorbidity Indices: A Register-Based Study of 350,000 Individuals Over 11 Years.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Model for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Among Average-Risk Adults in China.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Fecal Occult Blood Screening Outcomes Adjusted for Contamination Bias and Nonadherence.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Indicators to identify cancer screening providers with suboptimal case detection: A scoping review.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Sequential invitations to FOBT screening and colorectal cancer incidence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Risk With Negative Colonoscopy or Nonadherence After Positive FOBT Screening.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Contrasts in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in screening trials of sigmoidoscopy vs the Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer colonoscopy trial.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of a single qualitative fecal immunochemical test on colonoscopy prioritization and mortality in risk-stratified patients with suspected colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Promises and pitfalls of multi-cancer early detection using liquid biopsy tests.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Global trends and epidemiological shifts in gastrointestinal cancers: insights from the past four decades.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Article
- The effect on colorectal cancer incidence and staging with population-based FOBT-screening in Sweden.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of a Four-miRNA Signature in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Costs of colorectal cancer screening in Sweden: an observational, longitudinal cost description.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Observational
- Review
- Construction of diagnostic models with machine-learning algorithms for colorectal cancer based on clinical laboratory parameters.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are implemented worldwide, but there are difficulties evaluating their effectiveness. The magnitude of routine CRC screening effectiveness regarding cancer-specific mortality is unclear. Objective: To evaluate cancer-specific mortality associated with early vs late or no invitation for routine CRC screening using fecal occult blood testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was performed in the region of Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden, between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021. All individuals of the target population of screening born from 1938 to 1954 were included. Data were analyzed from December 12, 2022, to June 25, 2023. Exposures: Individuals were invited early (2008-2012), late (2013-2015), or not at all to screening with biennial guaiac-based fecal occult blood test. The early invitation group was considered the exposure group and the late or no invitation group was considered the control group. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cancer-specific mortality, defined as CRC registered in the Cancer Register with CRC as underlying cause of death in the Cause of Death Register. Excess mortality was calculated as all-cause deaths among the individuals with CRC subtracted from the expected number of deaths had they not had CRC. Poisson regression analysis based on deaths and person-years was used to estimated mortality rate ratio (RR) with 95% CIs, adjusted for follow-up years and attained age. Results: In total, 379 448 individuals (193 436 [51.0%] female) were invited for CRC screening, including 203 670 individuals in the exposure group and 175 778 in the control group. The mean screening participation rate was 63.3%, and there was a maximum of 14 years follow-up. There were 834 CRC deaths in 2 190 589 person-years in the exposure group, compared with 889 CRC deaths in 2 249 939 person-years in the control group. Individuals who underwent early CRC screening had reduced adjusted risk of CRC mortality (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95) and excess mortality (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93). Conclusions and Relevance: This prospective cohort study of routine screening with fecal occult blood testing found a 14% decrease in CRC mortality associated with screening. The true association of screening with reduced mortality is expected to be higher due to some coexistence of testing in the control group and CRC deaths diagnosed more than 2 years after screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.