Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411806›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Quantitation of ER Morphology and Dynamics.

Mark Fricker, Emily Breeze, Charlotte Pain, Verena Kriechbaumer, Carlos Aguilar, José M Ugalde, Andreas J Meyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark FrickerDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mark.fricker@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Emily BreezeSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Charlotte PainDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Verena KriechbaumerDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Carlos AguilarDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
José M UgaldeINRES-Chemical Signalling, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas J MeyerINRES-Chemical Signalling, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Oxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant endoplasmic reticulum forms a network of tubules connected by three-way junctions or sheet-like cisternae. Although the network is three-dimensional, in many plant cells, it is constrained to thin volume sandwiched between the vacuole and plasma membrane, effectively restricting it to a 2-D planar network. The structure of the network, and the morphology of the tubules and cisternae can be automatically extracted following intensity-independent edge-enhancement and various segmentation techniques to give an initial pixel-based skeleton, which is then converted to a graph representation. ER dynamics can be determined using optical flow techniques from computer vision or persistency analysis. Collectively, this approach yields a wealth of quantitative metrics for ER structure and can be used to describe the effects of pharmacological treatments or genetic manipulation. The software is publicly available.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumCell MembraneFoodPlant CellsEndoplasmic reticulum dynamicsEndoplasmic reticulum morphologyER cisternaeLunaparkNetwork analysisPersistency analysisPhase congruencyQuantitative confocal imagingReticulon

Identifiers

PMID38411806
OpenAlexW4392206922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.