Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411786›Full record

ReviewPediatric surgery international2024

Clinical practice guidelines in the management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion: a systematic evaluation using the AGREE II instrument.

Anza Rizvi, Fatima Rizvi, Kevin Chorath, Neeraj V Suresh, Emma De Ravin, Dominic Romeo, Deepak Lakshmipathy, Louis-Xavier Barrette, Karthik Rajasekaran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anza Rizvi *Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fatima Rizvi *Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kevin ChorathDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut St, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Neeraj V SureshDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut St, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Emma De RavinDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dominic RomeoPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Deepak LakshmipathyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut St, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Louis-Xavier BarretteDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut St, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Karthik RajasekaranDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut St, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. karthik.rajasekaran@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been produced to optimize the diagnosis and management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion. However, to date there have been no critical evaluations of their methodological rigor or quality. Herein, we address this need via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.

methodsA literature search of Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Scopus was performed up until February 25, 2021. Identified CPGs were then assessed by four independent reviewers trained in AGREE II. A scaled domain score of >60% was indicated as satisfactory quality. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-reviewer agreement.

results11 guidelines were assessed with only one being classified as high quality and others being either average (two) or low quality (eight). Domain 4 (clarity of presentation) achieved the highest mean score (66.41 ± 13.33%), while domain 5 (applicability) achieved the lowest score (10.80 ± 10.37%). ICC analysis revealed generally strong agreement between reviewers with a range of 0.60-0.98.

conclusionQuality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument suggests that the methodologic rigor and quality of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion need significant improvement.

Indexed as

EatingRespiratory AspirationChildHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicAGREE IIAppraisalClinical practice guidelinePediatric foreign bodyQuality

Identifiers

PMID38411786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.