ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Expanding the Use of HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer at Time of Interval Debulking Surgery to FIGO Stage IV and After 6 Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Analysis on Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07070973 (HEMOdynamic Proactive Management During Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal hyPErthermic Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HEMOdynamic Proactive Management During Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal hyPErthermic Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Perioperative Fluid Management and Renal Protection in Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC): A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Meta-Analysis on the Long-Term Impact of Cytoreductive Surgery Plus HIPEC for Ovarian Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Are We on the Right Path?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The role of complete cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma: where do we stand today? A comprehensive review and clinical insights from a leading oncology center in India.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- New insights in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Intra-abdominal temperature variation during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy evaluated via computational fluid dynamics modeling.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Author's reply to correspondence on "Expanding the Use of HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer at Interval Debulking Surgery to FIGO Stage IV and After 6 Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Analysis and Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes" by Mukurdipi Ray et al.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRandomized data on patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer receiving ≤ 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) showed that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after interval debulking surgery (IDS) improved patient's survival. We assessed the perioperative outcomes and PFS of FIGO stage IV and/or patients receiving up to 6 cycles of NACT undergoing IDS+HIPEC.
methodsProspectively collected cases from January 1, 2019 to July 31, 2022 were included. Patients underwent HIPEC if: age ≥ 18 years but < 75 years, body mass index ≤ 35 kg/m
resultsA total of 205 patients were included. No difference was found in baseline characteristics between FIGO Stage III and IV patients, whereas rate of stable disease after NACT (p = 0.004), mean surgical complexity score at IDS (p = 0.001), and bowel resection rate (p = 0.046) were higher in patients undergoing delayed IDS. A lower rate of patients with at least one G3-G5 postoperative complications was observed in FIGO stage IV versus FIGO stage III disease (5.3% vs. 14.0%; p = 0.052). This difference was confirmed at multivariable analysis (odds ratio [OR] 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.80; p = 0.02), whereas age, SCS, bowel resection, and number of cycles did not affect postoperative complications. No difference in PFS was identified neither between FIGO stage III and IV patients (p = 0.44), nor between 3 and 4 versus > 4 cycles of NACT (p = 0.85).
conclusionsBecause of the absence of additional complications and positive survival outcomes, HIPEC administration can be considered in selected FIGO stage IV and patients receiving > 4 cycles of NACT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.