Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411713›Full record

ReviewPlant cell reports2024

Transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics interventions prompt crop improvement against metal(loid) toxicity.

Ali Raza, Hajar Salehi, Shanza Bashir, Javaria Tabassum, Monica Jamla, Sidra Charagh, Rutwik Barmukh, Rakeeb Ahmad Mir, Basharat Ahmad Bhat, Muhammad Arshad Javed and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Improving plant breeding through AI-supported data integration.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Ali RazaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5120-2791
Hajar SalehiDepartment for Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122, Piacenza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-9423
Shanza BashirInstitute of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-8539
Javaria TabassumDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-9389
Monica JamlaDepartment of Biotechnology, Modern College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune, 411016, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-9798
Sidra CharaghState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-7324
Rutwik BarmukhWA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-8992
Rakeeb Ahmad MirDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-2349
Basharat Ahmad BhatDepartment of Bio-Resources, Amar Singh College Campus, Cluster University Srinagar, Srinagar, JK, India.
Muhammad Arshad JavedDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Dong-Xing GuanZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Institute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-0681
Reyazul Rouf MirDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (SKUAST), Srinagar, Kashmir, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-211X
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. kadambot.siddique@uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-4235
Rajeev K VarshneyWA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia. rajeev.varshney@murdoch.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-9131
Murdoch University · AUSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INUniversity of the Punjab · PKChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNCluster University Srinagar · INNational University of Sciences and Technology · PKSavitribai Phule Pune University · INShenzhen University · CNThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITZhejiang University · CN

Funding

Murdoch University XXXX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The escalating challenges posed by metal(loid) toxicity in agricultural ecosystems, exacerbated by rapid climate change and anthropogenic pressures, demand urgent attention. Soil contamination is a critical issue because it significantly impacts crop productivity. The widespread threat of metal(loid) toxicity can jeopardize global food security due to contaminated food supplies and pose environmental risks, contributing to soil and water pollution and thus impacting the whole ecosystem. In this context, plants have evolved complex mechanisms to combat metal(loid) stress. Amid the array of innovative approaches, omics, notably transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have emerged as transformative tools, shedding light on the genes, proteins, and key metabolites involved in metal(loid) stress responses and tolerance mechanisms. These identified candidates hold promise for developing high-yielding crops with desirable agronomic traits. Computational biology tools like bioinformatics, biological databases, and analytical pipelines support these omics approaches by harnessing diverse information and facilitating the mapping of genotype-to-phenotype relationships under stress conditions. This review explores: (1) the multifaceted strategies that plants use to adapt to metal(loid) toxicity in their environment; (2) the latest findings in metal(loid)-mediated transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics studies across various plant species; (3) the integration of omics data with artificial intelligence and high-throughput phenotyping; (4) the latest bioinformatics databases, tools and pipelines for single and/or multi-omics data integration; (5) the latest insights into stress adaptations and tolerance mechanisms for future outlooks; and (6) the capacity of omics advances for creating sustainable and resilient crop plants that can thrive in metal(loid)-contaminated environments.

Indexed as

EcosystemProteomicsArtificial IntelligenceGene Expression ProfilingMetalsSoilMetalsSoilArtificial intelligenceBioinformatic toolsClimate changeDefense responsesEnvironmental pollutionMetal toxicityOmics approaches

Identifiers

PMID38411713
PMCPMC10899315
OpenAlexW4392200100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.