Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411694›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Validation of the modified CT criteria for identifying non-adenomas.

Min Hwan Kwak, Ji-Sup Yun, Ji Na Kim, Young Rae Lee, Chan Kyo Kim, Kyung A Kang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min Hwan Kwak *Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Ji-Sup Yun *Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Na KimDepartment of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Rae LeeDepartment of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chan Kyo KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea. chankyo.kim@samsung.com.
Kyung A KangDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea. Kyunga03.kang@samsung.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-1206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough adrenal computed tomography (CT) percentage washout is a potentially powerful imaging technique for differentiating adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas, its application to non-adenomas can be problematic. Recently, modified criteria for diagnosing pheochromocytomas using adrenal CT were developed based on data from 199 patients with surgically proven pheochromocytomas and adenomas. However, these criteria have not been thoroughly validated. The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of the modified criteria for diagnosing non-adenomas including pheochromocytomas.

methodsThe conventional and modified criteria were applied to 266 patients from two cohorts who had surgically proven lipid-poor adenomas (155/266, 58.3%) and non-adenomas (111/266, 41.7%) and underwent adrenal CT. Two radiologists calculated the attenuation on each dynamic phase and percentage washout of adrenal masses. The final assessments based on the conventional and modified criteria were categorized into adenomas or non-adenomas. The diagnostic performance of each criterion for diagnosing non-adenomas was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). False negatives and positives were also compared.

resultsThe AUC for the diagnosis of non-adenomas was 0.806 for conventional criteria and 0.858 for modified criteria (p = 0.047). The false-negative rate of conventional criteria for the diagnosis of non-adenomas was 29.7%. Use of modified criteria could have reduced the false-negative rate by to 7.2%. The false-positive rate increased from 9% to 21.3% when using the modified criteria.

conclusionThe utilization of modified criteria has the potential to identify additional non-adenomas that would otherwise be misdiagnosed as adenomas using conventional criteria alone.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenomaAdultAgedContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPheochromocytomaRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaAdenomaAdrenal glandsAdrenocortical carcinomaNeoplasm metastasisPheochromocytoma

Identifiers

PMID38411694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.