Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411386›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2024

Machine-learning algorithms in screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Data from Fasa Adults Cohort Study.

Hanieh Karmand, Aref Andishgar, Reza Tabrizi, Alireza Sadeghi, Babak Pezeshki, Mahdi Ravankhah, Erfan Taherifard, Fariba Ahmadizar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanieh KarmandStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Aref AndishgarUSERN Office, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Reza TabriziNoncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Science, Fasa, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-3948
Alireza SadeghiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Babak PezeshkiClinical Research Development Unit, Valiasr Hospital, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Mahdi RavankhahStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Erfan TaherifardStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-0321
Fariba AhmadizarData Science and Biostatistics Department, Julius Global Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe application of machine learning (ML) is increasingly growing in biomedical sciences. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and compare the performance of ML methods in identifying individuals with the disease in an Iranian setting.

methodsUsing the baseline data from Fasa Adult Cohort Study (FACS) and in a sex-stratified manner, we studied factors associated with T2DM by applying seven different ML methods including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Bagging classifier (BAG). We further compared the performance of these methods; for each algorithm, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Area Under Curve (AUC) were calculated.

results10,112 participants were recruited between 2014 and 2016, of whom 1246 had T2DM at baseline. 4566 (45%) participants were males, aged between 35 and 70 years. For males, age, sugar consumption, and history of hospitalization were the most weighted variables regarding their importance in screening for T2DM using the GBM model, respectively; these variables were sugar consumption, urine blood, and age for females. GBM outperformed other models for both males and females with AUC of 0.75 (0.69-0.82) and 0.76 (0.71-0.80), and F1 score of 0.33 (0.27-0.39) and 0.42 (0.38-0.46), respectively. GBM also showed a sensitivity of 0.24 (0.19-0.29) and a specificity of 0.98 (0.96-1.0) in males and a sensitivity of 0.38 (0.34-0.42) and specificity of 0.92 (0.89-0.95) in females. Notably, close performance characteristics were detected among other ML models.

conclusionsGBM model might achieve better performance in screening for T2DM in a south Iranian population.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultAgedAlgorithmsCohort StudiesDietary SugarsFemaleHumansIranMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedDietary Sugarsmachine learningscreeningtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID38411386
PMCPMC10897867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.