ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2024
Anti-Wound Dehiscence and Antibacterial Dressing with Highly Efficient Self-Healing Feature for Guided Bone Regeneration Wound Closure.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and applications of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Guided Bone Regeneration for Vertical Alveolar Augmentation: Clinical Evaluation of d-PTFE-Ti Membranes and Comparison with Collagen Membranes: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Effect of Poly (Lactic Acid/ε-Caprolactone) Bilayer Membrane on Tooth Extraction Socket Wound Healing in a Rat Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Implantable Dental Barrier Membranes as Regenerative Medicine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Anti-Wound Dehiscence and Antibacterial Dressing with Highly Efficient Self-Healing Feature for Guided Bone Regeneration Wound Closure.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a well-established technique for preserving and enhancing alveolar ridge structures. Success in GBR relies on fulfilling the Primary wound closure, Angiogenesis, Space maintenance, and Stability (PASS) principles. Conventional methods, involving titanium meshes and sutures, have drawbacks, including the need for secondary removal and customization challenges. To address these issues, an innovative multifunctional GBR dressing (MGD) based on self-healing elastomer (PUIDS) is introduced. MGD provides sutureless wound closure, prevents food particle accumulation, and maintains a stable environment for bone growth. It offers biocompatibility, bactericidal properties, and effectiveness in an oral GBR model. In summary, MGD provides a reliable, stable osteogenic environment for GBR, aligning with PASS principles and promoting superior post-surgery bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.