Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411318›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2024

Immunogenicity of avelumab in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma or advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Ping Hu, Haiqing Isaac Dai, James Bourdage, Dongli Zhou, Ky Trang, Karey Kowalski, Carlo Bello, Jennifer Hibma, Akash Khandelwal, Kyra Cowan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ping HuEMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-5743
Haiqing Isaac DaiEMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5160-2779
James Bourdagethe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-9000-627X
Dongli Zhouthe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-0720-7880
Ky Trangthe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0412-2832
Karey KowalskiPfizer, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-3349-2317
Carlo BelloPfizer, San Diego, California, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-4923-6723
Jennifer HibmaPfizer, San Diego, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-2186
Akash Khandelwalthe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-7173
Kyra Cowanthe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4811-7748
Jennifer DongEMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-7074
Karthik VenkatakrishnanEMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-9813
Wei GaoEMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3149-8486
Merck (Germany) · DEOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like other monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be immunogenic in some patients, potentially affecting pharmacokinetics (PKs) and clinical outcomes. In post hoc analyses, we characterized antidrug antibody (ADA) development with avelumab monotherapy in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (first-line [1L; N = 116] and second-line or later [≥2L; N = 88] cohorts) or with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 (1L maintenance [N = 350]) and JAVELIN Solid Tumor (≥2L [N = 249]) trials. Treatment-emergent ADAs developed in a numerically higher proportion of patients with aUC (1L maintenance, 19.1%; ≥2L, 18.1%) versus mMCC (1L, 8.2%; ≥2L, 8.9%); incidences within tumor types were similar by line of therapy. In PK analyses, numerically lower avelumab trough concentration and higher baseline clearance were observed in treatment-emergent ADA+ versus ADA- subgroups; however, differences were not clinically relevant. Numerical differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, or objective response rate by ADA status were observed; however, no clinically meaningful trends were identified. Proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; any grade or grade 3/4), serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, or infusion-related reactions were similar, with overlapping 80% confidence intervals between ADA subgroups. Efficacy and safety observations were similar in subgroups defined by early development of ADA+ status during treatment. In conclusion, no meaningful differences in PKs, efficacy, and safety were observed between subgroups of avelumab-treated patients with different ADA status. Overall, these data suggest that ADAs are not relevant for treatment decisions with avelumab.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellSkin NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedClinical Trials as TopicHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedavelumab

Identifiers

PMID38411318
PMCPMC10897865
OpenAlexW4392198384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.