Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411172›Full record

ArticleCognition & emotion2024

Observational learning of threat-related attentional bias.

Laurent Grégoire, Mirela Dubravac, Kirsten Moore, Namgyun Kim, Brian A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition & emotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurent GrégoireDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Mirela DubravacDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Kirsten MooreDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Namgyun KimDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio.
Brian A AndersonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

The Control of Attention and Learning from Physical EffortR01DA046410 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, BRIAN AUGUST · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attentional bias to threat has been almost exclusively examined after participants experienced repeated pairings between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). This study aimed to determine whether threat-related attentional capture can result from observational learning, when participants acquire knowledge of the aversive qualities of a stimulus without themselves experiencing aversive outcomes. Non-clinical young-adult participants (

Indexed as

Attentional BiasConditioning, ClassicalFearAdolescentAdultEmpathyFemaleHumansLearningMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adultattentional prioritisationobservational aversive learningoculometrySelective attentionsocial conditioning

Identifiers

PMID38411172
PMCPMC11321941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.