Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411134›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Electronic Case Reporting Development, Implementation, and Expansion in the United States.

Kimberly Knicely, John W Loonsk, Janet J Hamilton, Annie Fine, Laura A Conn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why Are Gonorrhea Case Rates Declining in the United States? A Research Agenda.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberly KnicelyOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7794-3996
John W LoonskJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Janet J HamiltonCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Annie FineCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Laura A ConnOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-8265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for a nationwide health information technology solution that could improve upon manual case reporting and decrease the clinical and administrative burden on the US health care system. We describe the development, implementation, and nationwide expansion of electronic case reporting (eCR), including its effect on public health surveillance and pandemic readiness.

methodsMultidisciplinary teams developed and implemented a standards-based, shared, scalable, and interoperable eCR infrastructure during 2014-2020. From January 27, 2020, to January 7, 2023, the team conducted a nationwide scale-up effort and determined the number of eCR-capable electronic health record (EHR) products, the number of reportable conditions available within the infrastructure, and technical connections of health care organizations (HCOs) and jurisdictional public health agencies (PHAs) to the eCR infrastructure. The team also conducted data quality studies to determine whether HCOs were discontinuing manual case reporting and early results of eCR timeliness.

resultsDuring the study period, the number of eCR-capable EHR products developed or in development increased 11-fold (from 3 to 33), the number of reportable conditions available increased 28-fold (from 6 to 173), the number of HCOs connected to the eCR infrastructure increased 143-fold (from 153 to 22 000), and the number of jurisdictional PHAs connected to the eCR infrastructure increased 2.75-fold (from 24 to 66). Data quality reviews with PHAs resulted in select HCOs discontinuing manual case reporting and using eCR-exclusive case reporting in 13 PHA jurisdictions. The timeliness of eCR was <1 minute. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The growth of eCR can revolutionize public health case surveillance by producing data that are more timely and complete than manual case reporting while reducing reporting burden.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electronic Health RecordsHumansPandemicsPublic Health SurveillanceSARS-CoV-2United Statescase surveillancedata standardselectronic case reportingelectronic health recordinfrastructure

Identifiers

PMID38411134
PMCPMC11284980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.