SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability and the Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does a non-dipping heart rate profile predict adverse maternal-fetal outcomes? evidence from 24-h ambulatory monitoring in the second half of high-risk pregnancies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Elevated blood pressure variability links cardiac autonomic dysfunction to complex arrhythmias in hypertension.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026Article
- Review
- Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions and Acceptance of Telemonitoring During Pregnancy and Early Labor: A Single-Center Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Blood Pressure Variability and Adverse Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the ALSPAC Cohort.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Long-term microvascular and blood pressure dysregulation after Preeclampsia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Review
- Autonomic Dysfunction and Cardiac Performance in Pregnant Women with Hypertensive Disorders: A Comparative Study Using Heart Rate Variability and Global Longitudinal Strain.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- JAHA Go Red for Women Spotlight on Women and Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Early prediction of low birth weight using boosting ensemble machine learning: A retrospective cohort study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term (visit-to-visit) blood pressure variability (BPV) and heart rate variability (HRV) outside pregnancy are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Given the limitations of relying solely on blood pressure level to identify pregnancies at risk, long-term (visit-to-visit) BPV or HRV may provide additional diagnostic/prognostic counsel. To address this, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between long-term BPV and HRV in pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. METHODS AND
resultsDatabases were searched from inception to May 2023 for studies including pregnant women, with sufficient blood pressure or heart rate measurements to calculate any chosen measure of BPV or HRV. Studies were excluded that reported short-term, not long-term, variability. Adjusted odds ratios were extracted. Eight studies (138 949 pregnancies) reporting BPV met our inclusion criteria; no study reported HRV and its association with pregnancy outcomes. BPV appeared to be higher in women with hypertension and preeclampsia specifically, compared with unselected pregnancy cohorts. Greater BPV was associated with significantly more adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly maternal (gestational hypertension [odds ratio range, 1.40-2.15], severe hypertension [1.40-2.20]), and fetal growth (small-for-gestational-age infants [1.12-1.32] or low birth weight [1.18-1.39]). These associations were independent of mean blood pressure level. In women with hypertension, there were stronger associations with maternal outcomes but no consistent pattern for perinatal outcomes.
conclusionsFuture work should aim to confirm whether BPV could be useful for risk stratification prospectively in pregnancy, and should determine the optimal management path for those women identified at increased risk of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.