Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410966›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Sex Differences in Receipt of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Considering Neighborhood Racial and Ethnic Composition.

Audrey L Blewer, Monique A Starks, Carolina Malta-Hansen, Comilla Sasson, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Rabab Al-Araji, Bryan F McNally, Anthony J Viera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Untangling sex disparities in cardiac arrest survival: navigating the complex interplay of predictors.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Closing the Gap: Addressing Racial Bias in Bystander CPR Administration.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Audrey L BlewerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health Duke University Durham NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-5191
Monique A StarksDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Durham NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4719-399X
Carolina Malta-HansenDepartment of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte Hellerup Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8074-7731
Comilla SassonDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Colorado Denver CO.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-6637
Marcus Eng Hock OngHealth Services and Systems Research Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-7612
Rabab Al-ArajiRollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA.
Bryan F McNallyRollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA.ORCID 0000-0003-3532-1931
Anthony J VieraDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health Duke University Durham NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-2052
Duke University · USEmory University · USGentofte Hospital · DKNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (K12) - Administrative SupplementK12AR084231 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Cindy Amundsen · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Evaluation of the Requirements and Critical Features of a Drone-Deployed AED Network to Improve Community-Level Survival after OHCAK23HL153889 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STARKS, MONIQUE ANDERSON · 2020 to 2024
$833k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153889NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) and defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary by sex, with women being less likely to receive these interventions in public. It is unknown whether sex differences persist when considering neighborhood racial and ethnic composition. We examined the odds of receiving B-CPR stratified by location and neighborhood. We hypothesized that women in predominantly Black neighborhoods will have a lower odds of receiving B-CPR. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a retrospective study using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). Neighborhoods were classified by census tract. We modeled the odds of receipt of B-CPR (primary outcome), automatic external defibrillation application, and survival to hospital discharge (secondary outcomes) by sex. CARES collected 457 621 arrests (2013-2019); after appropriate exclusion, 309 662 were included. Women who had public OHCA had a 14% lower odds of receiving B-CPR (odds ratio [OR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.89]), but effect modification was not seen by neighborhood (

conclusionsWomen with public OHCA have a decreased likelihood of receiving B-CPR and automatic external defibrillation application. Findings did not differ significantly according to neighborhood composition. Despite this, our work has implications for considering strategies to reduce disparities around bystander response.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestFemaleHumansMaleRacial GroupsResidence CharacteristicsRetrospective StudiesSex Characteristicscardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationdisparitiesrace and ethnicitysex differences

Identifiers

PMID38410966
PMCPMC10944027
OpenAlexW4392197921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.