ArticlePeerJ2024
Non-invasive measurements to identify mungbean genotypes for waterlogging tolerance.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the best-fit leguminous crop for intercropping across time and space, mungbean promises to sustain soil health, carbon sequestration, and nutritional security across the globe. However, it is susceptible to waterlogging, a significant constraint that persists during heavy rains. Since the predicted climate change scenario features fewer but more intense rainy days. Hence, waterlogging tolerance in mungbean has been one of the major breeding objectives. The present experiment aimed to employ non-destructive tools to phenotype stress tolerance traits in mungbean genotypes exposed to waterlogging and estimate the association among the traits. A total of 12 mungbean genotypes were used in the present study to assess waterlogging tolerance at the seedling stage. Plant responses to stress were determined non-destructively using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters at different time intervals. NDVI and grain yield were positively associated with control (r = 0.64) and stress (r = 0.59). Similarly, chlorophyll fluorescence (quantum yield of PS-II) also had a significant positive association with grain yield under both control (r = 0.52) and stress (r = 0.66) conditions. Hence, it is suggested that NDVI and chlorophyll fluorescence promise to serve as traits for non-destructive phenotyping waterlogging tolerance in mungbean genotypes. With the methods proposed in our study, it is possible to phenotype hundreds of plants for waterlogging tolerance efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.