Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410802›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Looking for the sponge loop: analyses of detritus on a Caribbean forereef using stable isotope and eDNA metabarcoding techniques.

Lauren K Olinger, Beverly McClenaghan, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Nicole Fahner, Lesley Berghuis, Hoda Rajabi, Patrick Erwin, Chad S Lane, Joseph R Pawlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lauren K OlingerCenter for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St Thomas, Virgin Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, United States of America.
Beverly McClenaghaneDNAtec Inc., Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.
Mehrdad HajibabaeieDNAtec Inc., Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.
Nicole FahnereDNAtec Inc., Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.
Lesley BerghuiseDNAtec Inc., Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.
Hoda RajabieDNAtec Inc., Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.
Patrick ErwinDepartment of Biology and Marine Biology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, United States of America.
Chad S LaneDepartment of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, United States of America.
Joseph R PawlikDepartment of Biology and Marine Biology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, United States of America.

Funding

National Science Foundation OCE 2218863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are biodiverse ecosystems that rely on trophodynamic transfers from primary producers to consumers through the detrital pathway. The sponge loop hypothesis proposes that sponges consume dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and produce large quantities of detritus on coral reefs, with this turn-over approaching the daily gross primary production of the reef ecosystem. In this study, we collected samples of detritus in the epilithic algal matrix (EAM) and samples from potential sources of detritus over two seasons from the forereef at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize. We chose this location to maximize the likelihood of finding support for the sponge loop hypothesis because Caribbean reefs have higher sponge abundances than other tropical reefs worldwide and the Mesoamerican barrier reef is an archetypal coral reef ecosystem. We used stable isotope analyses and eDNA metabarcoding to determine the composition of the detritus. We determined that the EAM detritus was derived from a variety of benthic and pelagic sources, with primary producers (micro- and macroalgae) as major contributors and metazoans (Arthropoda, Porifera, Cnidaria, Mollusca) as minor contributors. None of the sponge species that reportedly produce detritus were present in EAM detritus. The cnidarian signature in EAM detritus was dominated by octocorals, with a scarcity of hard corals. The composition of detritus also varied seasonally. The negligible contribution of sponges to reef detritus contrasts with the detrital pathway originally proposed in the sponge loop hypothesis. The findings indicate a mix of pelagic and benthic sources in the calmer summer and primarily benthic sources in the more turbulent spring.

Indexed as

AnthozoaEcosystemAnimalsCaribbean RegionCoral ReefsIsotopesIsotopesCoral reefDetrituseDNAPoriferaStable isotope analysesTrophodynamics

Identifiers

PMID38410802
PMCPMC10896084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.