Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410792›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Patients' and caregivers' experiences of virtual care in a primary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: A patient-oriented research study.

Gayle Halas, Alanna Baldwin, Kerri Mackay, Ernesto Cardenas, Lisa LaBine, Phyllis Cherrett, Linda Abraham, Vivianne Fogarty, Alexander Singer, Alan Katz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gayle HalasRady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Alanna BaldwinRady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kerri MackayCommunity Partner, Winnipeg, Canada.
Ernesto CardenasRady Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2650-5360
Lisa LaBineRady Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Phyllis CherrettCommunity Partner, Winnipeg, Canada.
Linda AbrahamCommunity Partner, Winnipeg, Canada.
Vivianne FogartyCommunity Partner, Winnipeg, Canada.
Alexander SingerRady Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Alan KatzRady Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Sarah KirbyGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Winnipeg, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study explored patient and caregiver expectations and experiences of virtual primary care in Manitoba, Canada. This study focused on accessibility of care, acceptability and perceptions of quality from 'users' of primary healthcare services. Due to the rapid implementation of virtual primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, patient/public input was largely bypassed. Methods: A mixed method was conducted in collaboration with Patient and Caregiver Community Advisors. Data was obtained from 696 surveys and 9 focus groups (n = 41 patients and caregivers). Results: Data suggest good acceptance of virtual visits, although considered a new experience despite almost exclusive use of the telephone. Participants preferred more input for choosing the type of visit but experienced less stress, time and inconvenience by using virtual care. There were mixed opinions of quality. More complex visits were associated with incomplete consultations and serve as one exemplar of the limitations due to lack of physical presence or contact. Unique communication skills were required to convey health concerns adequately and accurately. A more transactional approach was perceived from the lack of visual cues and the awkwardness associated with pauses during the phone conversation. Virtual care may be better used for certain circumstances but should encompass patient-centred decision making for when and how. Many expressed interests in video options; technology access and user ability are additional considerations for advancing virtual care. Conclusions: The experiences and recommendations from patients and caregivers provide an important contribution to decision-making and integrating and sustaining quality virtual care for patient-centered healthcare service delivery. Keywords: Virtual care experiences, primary care, patient-oriented research, mixed methods, COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19patient carepatient experiencepatient-orientedPrimary health caretelehealth < Generaltelemedicine < Generalvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID38410792
PMCPMC10896066
OpenAlexW4392172506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.