Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410695›Full record

ReviewContact (Thousand Oaks (Ventura County, Calif.))

C

Cyan Ching, Julien Maufront, Aurélie di Cicco, Daniel Lévy, Manuela Dezi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contact (Thousand Oaks (Ventura County, Calif.)). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Imaging and proteomics toolkits for studying organelle contact sites.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Editorial on Special Collection inContact (Thousand Oaks (Ventura County, Calif.))
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cyan ChingInstitut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR168, Laboratoire Physique des Cellules et Cancer, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-7490
Julien MaufrontInstitut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR168, Laboratoire Physique des Cellules et Cancer, Paris, France.
Aurélie di CiccoInstitut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR168, Laboratoire Physique des Cellules et Cancer, Paris, France.
Daniel LévyInstitut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR168, Laboratoire Physique des Cellules et Cancer, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-4072
Manuela DeziInstitut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR168, Laboratoire Physique des Cellules et Cancer, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-9910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy has played a pivotal role in elucidating the ultrastructure of membrane contact sites between cellular organelles. The advent of cryo-electron microscopy has ushered in the ability to determine atomic models of constituent proteins or protein complexes within sites of membrane contact through single particle analysis. Furthermore, it enables the visualization of the three-dimensional architecture of membrane contact sites, encompassing numerous copies of proteins, whether in vitro reconstituted or directly observed in situ using cryo-electron tomography. Nevertheless, there exists a scarcity of cryo-electron microscopy studies focused on the site of membrane contact and their constitutive proteins. This review provides an overview of the contributions made by cryo-electron microscopy to our understanding of membrane contact sites, outlines the associated limitations, and explores prospects in this field.

Indexed as

Cryo-electron microscopycryo-electron tomographylipid transfer proteinmembrane contact sitesstructure

Identifiers

PMID38410695
PMCPMC10895918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.