ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Research on the risk governance of fraudulent reimbursement of patient consultation fees.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic impact of health insurance fraud, waste, and abuse: a literature review of direct and indirect costs and system sustainability.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Governance of the risk of operating deficits in basic medical insurance funds in China: based on the data from City H for the period 2021-2025.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Enhancing predictions of health insurance overspending risk through hospital departmental performance indicators.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The fundamental medical insurance fund, often referred to as the public's "life-saving fund," plays a crucial role in both individual well-being and the pursuit of social justice. Medicare fraudulent claims reduce "life-saving money" to "Tang's monk meat", undermining social justice and affecting social stability. Methods: We utilized crawler technology to gather textual data from 215 cases involving fraudulent health insurance claims. Simultaneously, statistical data spanning 2018 to 2021 was collected from the official websites of the China Medical Insurance Bureau and Anhui Medical Insurance Bureau. The collected data underwent comprehensive analysis through Excel, SPSS 26.0 and R4.2.1. Differential Auto-Regressive Moving Average Model (ARIMA (p, d, q)) was used to fit the fund safety forecast model, and test the predictive validity of the forecast model on the fund security data from July 2021 to October 2023 (the fund security data of Anhui Province from September 2021 to October 2023). Results: The outcomes revealed that fraudulent claims by health insurance stakeholders adversely impact the equity of health insurance funds. Furthermore, the risk management practices of Medicare fund administrators influence the publication of fraudulent claims cases. Notably, differences among Medicare stakeholders were observed in the prevalence of fraudulent claims. Additionally, effective governance of fraudulent claims risks was found to have a positive impact on the overall health of healthcare funds. Moreover, the predictive validity of the forecast model on the national and Anhui province's fund security data was 92.86% and 100% respectively. Conclusion: We propose four recommendations for the governance of health insurance fraudulent claims risk behaviors. These recommendations include strategies such as "combatting health insurance fraudulent claims to preserve the fairness of health insurance funds", "introducing initiatives for fraud risk governance and strengthening awareness of the rule of law", "focusing on designated medical institutions and establishing a robust long-term regulatory system", and "adapting to contemporary needs while maintaining a focus on long-term regulation".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.