ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
A better method to evaluate the reliability of echocardiography for assessment of pulmonary hypertension: comparison of tricuspid regurgitant spectrum quality grading and tricuspid valve regurgitation degree.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical research on echocardiographic screening for pulmonary hypertension: TRV >2.8 m/s and mPAP >20 mmHg.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is recommended as the most important noninvasive screening tool for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH), sonographers usually measure the volume of regurgitant flow rather than evaluating the spectral quality, so physicians will determine whether the ultrasound measurements of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (US-PASP) are reliable based on the volume of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Therefore, for the first time, we grade the quality of TR spectrum (TRS) based on its integrity and clarity, aiming to assess clinical application value of different tricuspid regurgitant spectrum quality grades (TR-SQG), and investigate whether the accuracy of US-PASP is more trustworthy than TR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) to compare the correlation and agreement between US-PASP and right heart catheterization measurements of PASP (RHC-PASP). TR area (TRA) and TRS were measured in each patient, and TR-SQG was performed. Results: The correlation coefficients between US-PASP and RHC-PASP were r=0.622 (P<0.001), r=0.754 (P<0.001), r=0.595 (P<0.001) in mild, moderate, severe TR, and r=0.301 (P=0.135), r=0.747 (P<0.001), r=0.739 (P<0.001), r=0.828 (P<0.001) in TR-SQG I-IV, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed the mean biases of 5.05, 3.06, 7.62 mmHg in mild, moderate, severe TR, and -16.47, -8.07, 1.82, 6.09 mmHg in TR-SQG I-IV, respectively. In mild TR with the TR-SQG III and IV, the correlation coefficients between US-PASP and RHC-PASP were r=0.779 (P<0.001), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.774, paired Conclusions: The US-PASP with TR-SQG III or IV is trustworthy, and its accuracy and consistency are better than those predicted by the traditional severity of TR. The establishment of the ultrasound evaluation system of TR-SQG helps clinicians to judge whether the US-PASP is accurate, credible, and reliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.