ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Understanding the systemic effects of intrapleural tPA and DNase by evaluating effects on coagulation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Review
- What is new in pleural infections?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyemas are common presentations that carry significant morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy includes antibiotics and chest tube placement. Due to the nature of the fluid, it is often difficult to drain completely using a chest tube. As outlined in multiple studies, intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and dornase alfa (DNase) are effective at helping clear these effusions and the avoidance of surgery. Despite research to better understand the effectiveness of the treatment and possible side effects, there continues to be a lack of data on potential systemic effects. Methods: This prospective observational pilot study was conducted from May 2021 until June 2022. Basic demographics, complications, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, D-Dimer, fibrinogen, and thromboelastography scans were measured both before and after infusion of chest tube tPA and DNase to assess for differences in coagulation using Signed Rank tests. Results: A total of 17 patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients were excluded due to protocol deviations. The median change score for lysis of clot at 30 minutes (Ly30), our primary outcome of interest, was 0 (P=0.88). There were no significant changes in other coagulation measures when comparing pre and post treatment. One patient (5.9%) had intrapleural bleeding associated with therapy. Three patients (17.6%) underwent surgical intervention to further treat their complicated pleural effusion. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate measurable changes in systemic coagulation after intrapleural tPA and DNase. Our data demonstrates no significant difference in coagulation after intrapleural tPA and DNase infusion, suggesting that there may not be clinically significant absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.