ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
A risk score for predicting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support before lung transplantation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elective Use of Intraoperative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis Reduces Primary Graft Dysfunction After Bilateral Lung Transplantation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Respiratory compliance related to prognostic of lung transplant patients with veno‑venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used as life support for lung transplantation. However, there are no clinical risk models to predict whether ECMO support is required for lung transplantation. This study developed a simple risk score to predict the need for intraoperative ECMO in patients undergoing lung transplantation, identify high-risk patients who need ECMO support, and guide clinical interventions. Methods: Patients, who underwent lung transplantation between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2021, were systematically reviewed. All enrolled patients were divided in a ratio of 7:3 to establish the development and validation datasets. A risk score model was established using stepwise logistic regression and verified using bootstrapping and the split-sample method. Results: A total of 248 patients who underwent lung transplants were enrolled. Multivariate analysis showed that the primary disease diagnosis, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, sex, surgical type, creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB, and pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were risk factors for intraoperative ECMO during lung transplantation. The risk score was established and calibrated according to these six factors, ranging from 0 to 41, with the associated prediction of intraoperative use of ECMO ranging from 1.5% to 99.7% (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ Conclusions: This simple risk score model effectively predicts the need for intraoperative ECMO and stratifies high-risk patients who require ECMO support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.