ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Shenfu injection as treatment for critical illness: a narrative review of clinical trials.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Shenfu injection (SFI) is a traditional herbal medicine derived from components of ginseng and aconite and is commonly used in China to treat a variety of conditions. Shenfu has been suggested to have beneficial effects in various critical illnesses, including heart failure, cardiac arrest, and septic shock. In recent years, there have been a number of studies reporting that SFI improves patient outcomes when used concurrently with other treatments, but its use has not been adopted outside of China. This narrative review explored the results of clinical trials that have tested SFI's efficacy in various critical illnesses. Methods: PubMed was searched for clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 1990 and July 2022 relating to clinical trials using SFI in various critical illnesses. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included to enable inclusion of data from trials originally not published in English. The selected articles were then summarized in the following disease categories: heart failure, cardiac arrest, sepsis, and severe pulmonary disease. Key Content and Findings: Clinical trials testing SFI in heart failure, cardiac arrest, sepsis, and pulmonary disease were reviewed. The design, methodology, and key findings of each trial or meta-analysis are summarized and discussed. Key limitations were also highlighted and discussed. Overall, several clinical trials suggest SFI may hold therapeutic potential for the treatment of critical illness, however, additional research is likely still needed. Conclusions: Based on the current body of literature, further research-especially multi-center randomized, double-blind trials with detailed reporting of all methods and results according to international guidelines-is needed to evaluate whether SFI is a useful addition to existing treatments for these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.