ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Evaluation of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of human lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- High Incidence of False Positives inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor ( Methods: We evaluated the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Assay for Results: The overall concordance between Idylla and ARMS was 89.51% [95% confidence interval (CI): 83.31% to 93.64%] and the specificity of Idylla was 88.68% (95% CI: 80.69% to 93.76%). A concordance of 97.67% (95% CI: 91.41% to 99.86%) was obtained between Idylla and NGS, the specificity of Idylla was 96.30% (95% CI: 86.16% to 99.36%). Compared to the ARMS and NGS, the Idylla™ system significantly reduces the turnaround time. Combining labor, equipment, reagents and time costs, Idylla is more affordable. Conclusions: Clinically urgent cases with adequate cellularity, can first perform Idylla to detect critical markers, then perform NGS for a comprehensive mutation analysis. Besides, with limited molecular expertise or infrastructure, the Idylla has the potential to extend
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.