ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Factors associated with increased diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: an observational single center study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endobronchial Ultrasonography (EBUS) with Lymph Node Aspiration: On-site Evaluation and Final Pathology Correlation.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Associated Factors for Non-Diagnostic Cytopathology in the Endobronchial Ultrasound-Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and molecular adequacy between conventional endobronchial ultrasound, contrast-enhanced endobronchial ultrasound and elastography for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies: a retrospective observational study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Pioneering endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in North Africa: Results from a prospective Moroccan case series.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an innovative tool for diagnosing mediastinal diseases. We investigated the factors affecting the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and evaluated whether the effects of these factors (number of biopsies, core tissue acquisition rate, and diameter and volume of tissue) vary depending on computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT results. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed lung cancer patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA at Korea University Ansan Hospital (January 2019-December 2022). Patients in whom EBUS-TBNA failed and those with missing diameter or volume data and no imaging data interpretation were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed by dividing the patients into None (no cancer detected on CT or PET/CT), Either (cancer detected on either CT or PET/CT), and Both (cancer detected on both CT and PET/CT) groups. Results: In all, 228 patients were enrolled; 351 lymph node stations were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years (male, 76.8%). Adenocarcinoma (28.5%) was the most common diagnosis. EBUS-TBNA was predominantly performed at station #4R (30.5%). Each examination involved two stations with a total procedure time of 30 minutes. An increased number of passes led to a higher diagnostic yield for EBUS-TBNA (P<0.001). Additionally, successful tissue sampling was associated with a large diameter (P=0.016) and volume (P=0.002) of the tissue. The effect of these factors was modified by imaging results. In the None and Either groups, an increase in the pass number was correlated with an increased diagnostic yield (adjusted P=0.003 and 0.007, respectively). However, in the Both group, it was not significant and remained at a suggestive level (P=0.304). The diameter and volume did not differ significantly across subgroups (adjusted P>0.05). Conclusions: Increasing the number of passes during EBUS-TBNA can maximize the diagnostic yield, especially when CT and/or PET/CT results are inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.