Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410570›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Survival comparison of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma, adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, and adenocarcinoma.

Qidong Tai, Yi Bao, Nan Song, Xuefei Hu, Liang Duan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qidong TaiDepartment of Medicine, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yi BaoThoracic Department of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Nan SongThoracic Department of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xuefei HuThoracic Department of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Liang DuanThoracic Department of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (ADE_ned) is a relatively uncommon pathological classification, and there exists considerable debate regarding its prognosis and treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyze the survival difference between patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), adenocarcinoma (ADE), or ADE_ned and to investigate the prognostic factors influencing the outcomes of individuals diagnosed with pulmonary ADE_ned. Methods: We retrieved information on 316 cases of ADE_ned, 188,823 cases of ADE, and 71,154 cases of NEC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. To account for potential confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. Comparative analyses were conducted to estimate the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Finally, the Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors associated with pulmonary ADE_ned. Results: Prior to PSM, patients with lung ADE_ned had a worse OS rate than did those with lung ADE or NEC (5-year OS rate: 13.3% Conclusions: Patients with lung ADE_ned had a significantly poorer survival outcome compared to those with lung ADE or NEC. Furthermore, sex, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and surgery were found to be independent prognostic indicators for cases with lung ADE_ned.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (ADE_ned)clinical featuresprognosis

Identifiers

PMID38410570
PMCPMC10894407
OpenAlexW4391364296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.