ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Minimally invasive surgery role in central squamous lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present body of literature provides restricted evidence concerning the application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in individuals diagnosed with centrally located, locally advanced, and initially surgically challenging squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCLC) following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Further research is warranted to elucidate the role and potential benefits of VATS in this particular patient population. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on individuals diagnosed with centrally located and locally advanced SqCLC who received preoperative CIT at a single institution. The study evaluated the percentage of VATS performed, conversion rates, and perioperative outcomes. Furthermore, survival outcomes related to the resection extent were compared between patients who underwent standard lobectomy (SL) and extended lobectomy (EL, e.g., sleeve, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy) after neoadjuvant CIT. Results: A total of 27 cases of centrally located SqCLC underwent neoadjuvant CIT followed by VATS, with one case requiring conversion to thoracotomy due to adhesions. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term cancer-specific mortality between the VATS group (N=24) and the thoracotomy group (N=13) did not yield any statistically significant differences. However, the VATS group exhibited a significantly higher frequency of SL (66.7% Conclusions: This study contributes valuable real-world evidence demonstrating the feasibility and safety of utilizing VATS in the management of patients with centrally located and locally advanced SqCLC following neoadjuvant CIT. However, careful consideration might be given to the extent of resection to optimize patient long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.