ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
The efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation training program for patients after lung transplantation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telehealth interventions to improve outcomes in lung transplant recipients: Primary results of the INSPIRE-III randomized clinical trial.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025Trial
- Feasibility, Safety and Outcomes of Early Mobilization in the ICU Following Lung Transplantation: A Scoping Review.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplantation: Its effects on pulmonary function, physical fitness, and quality of life.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- Postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation care for a case of acute perfluorocarbon poisoning undergoing lung transplantation: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Perioperative respiratory rehabilitation: evolving concepts and clinical applications.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Review
- Optimizing patient outcomes in interstitial lung disease through pre- and post-transplant management strategies.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Impact of Pulmonary Hypertension on Posttransplant Survival of Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis at High Altitude: A Prospective Cohort Study.Canadian respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Postoperative conditions of rehabilitative interest in lung transplantation: a systematic review.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is recognized widely as one of the most effective measures to promote postoperative recovery of lung transplant recipients (LTRs), and it has positive effects on both short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) and survival outcomes. However, no standardized pulmonary rehabilitation training programs exist specifically for LTRs. The pulmonary rehabilitation programs widely used in clinical practice focus mainly on exercise or respiratory training, to some extent neglecting other therapeutic methods that could promote patient health, such as nutrition support, pain control, spiritual comfort, and so on. This study aimed to develop a postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation training program for LTRs and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods: Using convenience sampling, all patients who underwent lung transplantation (LTx) at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a total of 68 patients were finally included in this study. A non-synchronous quasi-experimental design was used, with patients who underwent LTx in 2021 as the control group and patients who underwent LTx in 2022 as the experimental group. The control group received routine treatment, health education, and rehabilitation guidance when patients determined the date of surgery. In addition to this, the experimental group received pulmonary rehabilitation training. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (pulmonary infections), duration of chest tube drainage, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, postoperative pain scores, postoperative QoL, pulmonary function, oxygenation index, and the distance in the 6-minute walking test (6MWD) were compared between the two groups. Results: The length of ICU stay and duration of chest tube drainage in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the results of oxygenation index, 6MWD, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (reflecting the QoL) were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the pain of the two groups 1 week after surgery and 3 months after surgery, and the pain score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group at 1 month after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation training program for LTRs is safe and effective. It can shorten both the duration of chest tube drainage and ICU stay, it can also improve patients' exercise capacity and pulmonary function while also promote safety outcomes of LTRs, and improve QoL scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.