ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Advancements in preoperative imaging of pectus excavatum: a comprehensive review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital Chest Wall Deformities in Children: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Modified Haller Index to a Novel Patented Anatomical Measurement Device: Engineering Development, Validation, and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Thoracic Morphometry.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pectus deformities in children: a pictorial review.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Subclinical Inflammation in Ischemic Heart Disease and Its Role in the Transition to Heart Failure.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Pectus Excavatum in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Sternal advancement surgery for pectus excavatum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiac and respiratory function outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Resting right ventricular function in pectus excavatum: do haller index and age matter?Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Quantification of Chest Wall Asymmetry in Healthy Females Using Standardized Computed Tomography-Derived Curve Modeling: A Proof of Concept.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectus excavatum, the most common pectus deformity, varies in severity and has been associated with cardiopulmonary impairment and psychological distress. Since its initial documentation, a multitude of imaging techniques for preoperative evaluation (i.e., diagnosis, severity classification, functional assessment, and surgical planning) have been reported. Conventional imaging techniques encompass computed tomography (CT), chest radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), echocardiography and medical photography, while three dimensional (3D) optical surface imaging is a promising emerging technique in the preoperative assessment of pectus excavatum. This narrative review explores the current insights and advancements of these imaging modalities. CT imaging allows for the calculation of pectus indices and evaluation of cardiac compression and displacement. Recent developments focus on automated calculations, minimizing radiation exposure and improving surgical planning. Chest radiography offers a radiation-reducing alternative for pectus index measurement, but is unsuitable for disproportionally asymmetric chest deformations. MRI is a radiation-free imaging method, and allows for the calculation of pectus indices as well as the assessment of cardiac function. Real-time MRI provides dynamic insights, while exercise MRI shows promise for comprehensive evaluation of cardiac function but requires additional developments. Using echocardiography, structural cardiac changes can be identified, but its use in evaluating cardiac function in pectus excavatum patients is limited. Medical photography combined with caliper measurements complements other imaging methods for qualitative and quantitative documentation of pectus excavatum. Emerging as an innovative technique, 3D optical surface imaging offers a rapid, radiation-free assessment of the deformity which correlates with conventional pectus indices. Potential applications include quantifying other morphological features and predicting cardiac compression. However, standardization and validation are needed for its widespread use. This review provides an overview of preoperative imaging of pectus excavatum, highlighting the current developments in conventional methods and the potential of the emerging 3D optical surface imaging technique. These advancements hold promise for the future of the assessment and surgical planning of pectus excavatum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.