Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410464›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Evaluation of Follow-up Colposcopy Procedures After Abnormal Cervical Screening Result Across a Statewide Study in Mississippi.

Sydney Reaves, Katherine C Hall, Mary W Stewart, Nicolas Wentzensen, Christina Ferrell, Carolann Risley, Jimmie Wells, Rhonda Rives, Fajada Bobo, Jon Daniels and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sydney ReavesUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Nursing.
Katherine C HallUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Nursing.
Mary W StewartMississippi State University, School of Nursing.
Nicolas WentzensenNational Cancer Institute.
Christina FerrellUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Nursing.
Carolann RisleyUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Cancer Research Institute.
Jimmie WellsUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Nursing.
Rhonda RivesMississippi Baptist Medical Center, Department of Pathology.
Fajada BoboUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Pathology.
Jon DanielsMississippi State Department of Health.
Kathy FarringtonMississippi State Department of Health.
Jody C MorganUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Medicine.
Megan A ClarkeNational Cancer Institute.
University of Mississippi Medical Center · USBaptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USCancer Research Institute · USMississippi State Department of Health · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI GOMEZ-SANCHEZ, CELSO ENRIQUE · 2016 to 2025
$38.2M
Cervical Cancer MoonshotZIACP010230 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHIFFMAN, MARK · 2018 to 2025
$33.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical screening is used to detect and treat precancers to prevent invasive cancers. However, successful prevention also requires adequate follow-up and treatment of individuals with abnormal screening results. The aim was to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up status for individuals needing colposcopy after an abnormal screening result. Methods: The STRIDES ( Results: Of the 1,458 individuals requiring colposcopy, 43.0% had the procedure within 4 months, 16.4% had a delayed procedure, and 39.5% had no documented follow-up, with significant predictors of follow-up identified as age and cytology diagnosis. Based on age, individuals 30 + were more likely to follow up with a colposcopy compared to individuals < 30 years (49% and 38.7%, respectively; p < .001). Individuals with cytology diagnoses of LSIL (52.9%), ASC-H (51.4%), and HSIL (62.3%) had higher percentages of adherence to follow-up colposcopy guidelines (p < .001). Conclusion: Despite high cervical cancer screening rates among Mississippians, a substantial portion did not have adequate next-step intervention. However, it is encouraging that highest risk individuals were more likely to have a colposcopy. Regardless, continuing to understand the underlying causes for incomplete follow-up is crucial for timely secondary targeted interventions to reduce cervical cancer burden, promote awareness, and improve health outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID38410464
PMCPMC10896379
OpenAlexW4391772433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.