Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410459›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

3D Convolutional Deep Learning for Nonlinear Estimation of Body Composition from Whole-Body Morphology.

Isaac Tian, Jason Liu, Michael Wong, Nisa Kelly, Yong Liu, Andrea Garber, Steven Heymsfield, Brian Curless, John Shepherd

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isaac TianUniversity of Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-4975-6290
Jason LiuUniversity of Washington.
Michael WongUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center.ORCID 0000-0003-2392-9253
Nisa KellyUniversity of Hawaii - Manoa.
Yong LiuUniversity of Hawaii - Manoa.
Andrea GarberUniversity of California - San Francisco.
Steven HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-9425
Brian CurlessUniversity of Washington.
John ShepherdUniversity of Hawaii - Manoa.

Funding

ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Elizabeth Austen Lawson, Takara Leah Stanley · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Sujoy Ghosh · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Refeeding in Anorexia NervosaR01HD082166 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GARBER, ANDREA K · 2015 to 2025
$5.7M
Shape up! KidsR01DK111698 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HEYMSFIELD, STEVEN, SHEPHERD, JOHN ALAN · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Optical Body Composition and Health AssessmentR01DK109008 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HEYMSFIELD, STEVEN, SHEPHERD, JOHN ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082166NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109008NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total and regional body composition are strongly correlated with metabolic syndrome and have been estimated non-invasively from 3D optical scans using linear parameterizations of body shape and linear regression models. Prior works produced accurate and precise predictions on many, but not all, body composition targets relative to the reference dual X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement. Here, we report the effects of replacing linear models with nonlinear parameterization and regression models on the precision and accuracy of body composition estimation in a novel application of deep 3D convolutional graph networks to human body composition modeling. We assembled an ensemble dataset of 4286 topologically standardized 3D optical scans from four different human body shape databases, DFAUST, CAESAR, Shape Up! Adults, and Shape Up! Kids and trained a parameterized shape model using a graph convolutional 3D autoencoder (3DAE) in lieu of linear PCA. We trained a nonlinear Gaussian process regression (GPR) on the 3DAE parameter space to predict body composition via correlations to paired DXA reference measurements from the Shape Up! scan subset. We tested our model on a set of 424 randomly withheld test meshes and compared the effects of nonlinear computation against prior linear models. Nonlinear GPR produced up to 20% reduction in prediction error and up to 30% increase in precision over linear regression for both sexes in 10 tested body composition variables. Deep shape features produced 6-8% reduction in prediction error over linear PCA features for males only and a 4-14% reduction in precision error for both sexes. Our best performing nonlinear model predicting body composition from deep features outperformed prior work using linear methods on all tested body composition prediction metrics in both precision and accuracy. All coefficients of determination (R

Indexed as

3D ScanningAutoencoderBody CompositionGaussian ProcessMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38410459
PMCPMC10896405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.