Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410399›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

We need to talk: a qualitative inquiry into pathways to care for young men at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Håkon Olav Åmlid, Jan Carlsson, Jone Bjørnestad, Inge Joa, Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting risk of psychosis in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Håkon Olav Åmlid *TIPS - Centre for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan CarlssonSchool of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Jone BjørnestadTIPS - Centre for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Inge JoaTIPS - Centre for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad *TIPS - Centre for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Örebro University · SEUniversity of Stavanger · NOStavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is known from the literature that men are slower to seek help and staying engaged in mental health care compared to women. Seeing that in psychosis, men more often than women have insidious onsets but also a more malign illness course, it is important to find ways to improve timely help-seeking. The aim of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators for help-seeking in young male persons struggling with early signs of psychosis. Methods: Qualitative interviews with nine young men who suffer from a first episode of psychosis or psychosis risk symptoms. Results: Male stereotypical ideals, significant others, and knowledge of symptoms and where to get help as well characteristics of symptom trajectories appeared to be important determinants of help-seeking behavior. Discussion: Interviews indicated that help-seeking in the participants was delayed first, because of reluctancy to disclose distress and second, because significant others were unable to accurately recognize symptoms. Information, awareness, and easy access to care remain important in early detection and intervention in psychosis and psychosis risk. However, more emphasis should be placed on de-stigmatizing mental health problems in men and aiming information specifically at them.

Indexed as

help-seekingmenpathways to carepsychosisultra-high risk

Identifiers

PMID38410399
PMCPMC10894910
OpenAlexW4391750340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.