ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Unraveling the microbiome-metabolome nexus: a comprehensive study protocol for personalized management of Behçet's disease using explainable artificial intelligence.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Integrated Metabolomics for Precision Pharmacotherapy: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Transformer Models, Graph Networks, and Generative AI in Gut Microbiome Research: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Personalized colorectal cancer risk assessment through explainable AI and Gut microbiome profiling.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Specific plasma metabolite profile in intestinal Behçet's syndrome.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presented study protocol outlines a comprehensive investigation into the interplay among the human microbiota, volatilome, and disease biomarkers, with a specific focus on Behçet's disease (BD) using methods based on explainable artificial intelligence. The protocol is structured in three phases. During the initial three-month clinical study, participants will be divided into control and experimental groups. The experimental groups will receive a soluble fiber-based dietary supplement alongside standard therapy. Data collection will encompass oral and fecal microbiota, breath samples, clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and dietary habits. The subsequent biological data analysis will involve gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, and metagenetic analysis to examine the volatilome and microbiota composition of salivary and fecal samples. Additionally, chemical characterization of breath samples will be performed. The third phase introduces Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for the analysis of the collected data. This novel approach aims to evaluate eubiosis and dysbiosis conditions, identify markers associated with BD, dietary habits, and the supplement. Primary objectives include establishing correlations between microbiota, volatilome, phenotypic BD characteristics, and identifying patient groups with shared features. The study aims to identify taxonomic units and metabolic markers predicting clinical outcomes, assess the supplement's impact, and investigate the relationship between dietary habits and patient outcomes. This protocol contributes to understanding the microbiome's role in health and disease and pioneers an XAI-driven approach for personalized BD management. With 70 recruited BD patients, XAI algorithms will analyze multi-modal clinical data, potentially revolutionizing BD management and paving the way for improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.