Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410265›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2024

Evaluation of fifteen processing methods of hellgrammites based on the flavor characteristics.

Yunying Zhang, Yupeng Liang, Wenming Zhang, Yan Ren, Xiaoming Bao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yunying ZhangPharmacy College, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610063 China.
Yupeng LiangPharmacy College, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610063 China.
Wenming ZhangPharmacy College, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610063 China.
Yan RenPharmacy College, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610063 China.ORCID 0000-0003-3350-7425
Xiaoming BaoShimadzu (China) Co., Ltd, Chengdu, 610063 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate suitable processing methods for improve the flavor while maintaining quality, hellgrammites were subjected to fifteen different processing methods. The samples were tested by sensory evaluation and were analyzed using HS-SPME-GC-MS. The sensory evaluation revealed that five methods for head and chest removal, three wine-fried methods, and three vinegar-roasting methods significantly reduced the levels of hexanal (3129.05 ± 45.77 μg/kg) and heptanal (436.72 ± 7.42 μg/kg), compounds responsible for fishy and earthy flavors, compared to raw samples. The latter two methods exhibited increased aroma flavor. PCA and OPLS-DA analyses suggested that acids, alcohols, and esters played a crucial role in flavor modification. Notably, vinegar-roasting methods demonstrated the highest acid content and had a substantial impact on volatile compounds. Additionally, boiling methods effectively reduced the levels of hazardous compounds, such as toluene and 1,3-Dimethyl-benzene. However, other methods did not exhibit similar efficacy in reducing hazardous compounds. The accumulation of hazardous compounds showed a decreasing trend in the whole insect, head removal, and head and chest removal groups. Moreover, the relative odor activity value consistently identified aldehyde compounds, including hexanal and heptanal, as the main contributors to aroma. Overall, boiling and head and chest removal procedures were suggested as precautionary measures during the initial processing of hellgrammites-based food products. The vinegar-roasting and wine-fried methods could be employed to impart desired flavors, aligning with consumers' preferences. These findings lay the foundation for standardizing processing techniques and ensuring the quality control of products derived from hellgrammites.

Indexed as

FlavorHellgrammitesHS-SPME-GC–MSProcessing methodsVolatile components

Identifiers

PMID38410265
PMCPMC10894185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.