ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis: time for a risk-based approach.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and external validation of a multivariable nomogram for predicting severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis in advanced lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review of Mechanisms and Management.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Precision Monitoring Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Review of Molecular Indicators for Early Detection and Risk Stratification.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity: a cellular pharmacology perspective on susceptibility and resistance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Advancing precision cardio-oncology: multimodal surveillance and stratified management of immunotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Case Report: Immunotherapy-induced myocarditis requiring pacemaker insertion in an older adult. what happens if we rechallenge?Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Guarding the heart in the era of immunotherapies: insights for cardio-oncology practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Early lymphocyte recovery predicts cardiovascular events and mortality in immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- From tumor immunotherapy to myocardial injury: A mechanistic discussion of immune checkpoint inhibitor‑related myocarditis (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- How should immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis be treated?Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis: a comprehensive analysis of clinical manifestations and prognostic factors.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Predicting 30-Day Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Observational Study Utilizing XGBoost.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Observational
- Critical Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy and Cardiac Health.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- Beyond monoclonal antibodies: constraints and the case for alternative PD-1/PD-L1-targeting formats.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Management Status of Myocarditis-Related Sudden Cardiac Death.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiac Troponin I and T in ICI Myocarditis Screening, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block immune checkpoints and therefore activate immune cells, allowing them to recognize and attack cancer cells. ICIs have revolutionized oncology practice, but their use has been complicated by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Of cardiovascular (CV) irAEs, ICI-related myocarditis has received significant attention due to high mortality rates, ranging from 25% to 50%, despite its overall low incidence. Establishing the early diagnosis of ICI-myocarditis is important for early initiation of steroids and consideration of hospitalization in patients who are at risk for hemodynamic compromise and need high acuity care in a tertiary setting. In this review, we summarize the diagnostic and prognostic tools for ICI-myocarditis, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with emphasis on circulating biomarkers. Cardiac troponins (cTns) are an essential component of the diagnosis of ICI-myocarditis, and we provide a summary of the recent studies that utilized different assays (cTnI vs. cTnT) and outcomes (diagnosis vs. prognosis including major adverse cardiac outcomes). With the exponential increase in ICI use across different oncology indications, there is a major need to include biomarkers in risk stratification to guide diagnosis and treatment. Our review proposes a framework for future multisite registries, including cTn evaluation at baseline and at the time of irAE suspicion, with development of central biobanking to allow head-to-head evaluation and clinical validation of different biomarker assays in ICI-myocarditis. This approach, with the inclusion of CV biomarkers into clinical and pragmatic oncology trials, holds promise to improve the early recognition and management of ICI-myocarditis and CV irAEs, thus leading to better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.