ReviewTranslational cancer research2024
Research progress in predicting visceral pleural invasion of lung cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D intratumoral heterogeneity-based quantitative score from chest CT for preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Correlation of solid proportion and lymph node metastasis in lung cancers ≤30 mm in diameter.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: In lung cancer, visceral pleural invasion (VPI) affects the selection of surgical methods, the scope of lymph node dissection and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperative or intraoperative prediction and diagnosis of VPI of lung cancer is helpful for choosing the best treatment plan and improving the prognosis of patients. This review aims to summarize the research progress of the clinical significance of VPI assessment, the intraoperative diagnosis technology of VPI, and various imaging methods for preoperative prediction of VPI. The diagnostic efficacy, advantages and disadvantages of various methods were summarized. The challenges and prospects for future research will also be discussed. Methods: A comprehensive, non-systematic review of the latest literature was carried out in order to investigate the progress of predicting VPI. PubMed database was being examined and the last run was on 4 August 2022. Key Content and Findings: The pathological diagnosis and clinical significance of VPI of lung cancer were discussed in this review. The research progress of prediction and diagnosis of VPI in recent years was summarized. The results showed that preoperative imaging examination and intraoperative freezing pathology were of great value. Conclusions: VPI is one of the adverse prognostic factors in patients with lung cancer. Accurate prediction of VPI status before surgery can provide guidance and help for the selection of clinical operation and postoperative treatment. There are some advantages and limitations in predicting VPI based on traditional computed tomography (CT) signs,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.