ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Potential added value of computed tomography radiomics to multimodal prediction models for benign and malignant breast tumors.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline and Early-Delta Quantitative Ultrasound Radiomics for Predicting Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A deep learning model based on chest CT to predict benign and malignant breast masses and axillary lymph node metastasis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- An XGBoost Machine Learning Based Model for Predicting Ki-67 Value ≥ 15% in TTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early diagnosis is crucial to the treatment of breast cancer, but conventional imaging detection is challenging. Radiomics has the potential to improve early diagnostic efficacy in a noninvasive manner. This study examined whether integrating computed tomography (CT) radiomics information based on ultrasound (US) models can improve the efficacy of breast cancer prediction. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 420 patients with pathologically confirmed benign or malignant breast tumors. Clinical data and examination images were collected, and the population was divided into training (n=294) and validation (n=126) groups at a ratio of 7:3. The region of interest (ROI) was manually segmented along the tumor boundary using MaZda software, and the features of each ROI was extracted. After dimension reduction and screening, the best features were retained. Subsequently, random forest (RF), support vector machines, and K-nearest neighbor classifiers were used to establish prediction models in an US and combined-methods group. Results: Finally, 8 of the 379 features were retained in the US group. Random forest was found to be the best model, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the training and validation groups was 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.852-0.942] and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.775-0.930), respectively. Meanwhile, 12 of the 750 features were retained in the combined group. In this regard, random forest proved to be the best model, and the AUC of the training and validation group was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.918-0.981) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.866-0.969), respectively. The calibration curve showed a good fit of the model. The decision curve showed that the clinical net benefit of the combined group was far greater than that of any single examination, and the prediction model of the combined group exhibited a degree of practical clinical value. Conclusions: The combined model based on US and CT images has potential application value in the prognostic prediction of benign and malignant breast diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.