Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Exploration of potential biomarkers for early bladder cancer based on urine proteomics.

Xu Zhou, Fei Xue, Tingmiao Li, Jiangshan Xue, Siqi Yue, Shujie Zhao, Hezhen Lu, Chengyan He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xu ZhouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Fei XueDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Tingmiao LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jiangshan XueDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Siqi YueDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shujie ZhaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changchun Infectious Diseases Hospital, Changchun, China.
Hezhen LuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Chengyan HeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jilin University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system. The progression of the condition is associated with a poor prognosis, so it is necessary to identify new biomarkers to improve the diagnostic rate of bladder cancer. Methods: In this study, 338 urine samples (144 bladder cancer, 123 healthy control, 32 cystitis, and 39 upper urinary tract cancer samples) were collected, among which 238 samples (discovery group) were analyzed by LC-MS. The urinary proteome characteristics of each group were compared with those of bladder cancer, and the differential proteins were defined by bioinformatics analysis. The pathways and functional enrichments were annotated. The selected proteins with the highest AUC score were used to construct a diagnostic panel. One hundred samples (validation group) were used to test the effect of the panel by ELISA. Results: Compared with the healthy control, cystitis and upper urinary tract cancer samples, the number of differential proteins in the bladder cancer samples was 325, 158 and 473, respectively. The differentially expressed proteins were mainly related to lipid metabolism and iron metabolism and were involved in the proliferation, metabolism and necrosis of bladder cancer cells. The AUC of the panel of APOL1 and ITIH3 was 0.96 in the discovery group. ELISA detection showed an AUC of 0.92 in the validation group. Conclusion: This study showed that urinary proteins can reflect the pathophysiological changes in bladder cancer and that important molecules can be used as biomarkers for bladder cancer screening. These findings will benefit the application of the urine proteome in clinical research.

Indexed as

biomarkerbladder cancerELISAproteomicurine

Identifiers

PMID38410113
PMCPMC10894981
OpenAlexW4391750272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.