Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409947›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

MRI-based radiomic features for identifying recurrent prostate cancer after proton radiation therapy.

Kazim Z Gumus, Samuel Serrano Contreras, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Ira Harmon, Mauricio Hernandez, Savas Ozdemir, Sindhu Kumar, Nurcan Yuruk, Mutlu Mete, K C Balaji and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazim Z GumusDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-6868
Samuel Serrano ContrerasDepartment of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Mohammed Al-ToubatDepartment of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Ira HarmonCenter for Data Solutions, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Mauricio HernandezDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Savas OzdemirDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Sindhu KumarDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Nurcan YurukDepartment of Computer Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Mutlu MeteDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA.
K C BalajiDepartment of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Mark BandykDepartment of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Dheeraj R GopireddyDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
University of Florida · USEast Texas A&M University · USSouthern Methodist University · US

Funding

University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville Launchpad Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) following proton beam therapy is challenging due to radiation-induced tissue changes. This study aimed to evaluate MRI-based radiomic features so as to identify the recurrent PCa after proton therapy.

methodsWe retrospectively studied 12 patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following proton therapy. Two experienced radiologists identified prostate lesions from multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) images post-proton therapy and marked control regions of interest (ROIs) on the contralateral side of the prostate gland. A total of 210 radiomic features were extracted from lesions and control regions on the T2-weighted (T2WI) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) image series. Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation method (RFE-CV) was used for feature selection. A Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network was developed to classify three classes: cancerous, benign, and healthy tissue. The 12-core biopsy results were used as the gold standard for the segmentations. The classifier performance was measured using specificity, sensitivity, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and other statistical indicators.

resultsBased on biopsy results, 10 lesions were identified as PCa recurrence while eight lesions were confirmed to be benign. Ten radiomic features (10/210) were selected to build the multi-class classifier. The radiomics classifier gave an accuracy of 0.83 in identifying cancerous, benign, and healthy tissue with a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.85. The model yielded an AUC of 0.87, 95% CI [0.72-1.00] in differentiating cancer from the benign and healthy tissues.

conclusionsOur proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential of using radiomic features as part of the differential diagnosis of PCa on mpMRI following proton therapy. The results need to be validated in a larger cohort.

Indexed as

MRIprostate cancerproton therapyradiomicsrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID38409947
PMCPMC10930012
OpenAlexW4392194686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.