Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409800›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Incidence of shoulder dystocia and risk factors for recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy-A historical register-based cohort study.

Maria Jeppegaard, Marie H Larsen, Amalie B Thams, Amalie B Schmidt, Steen C Rasmussen, Lone Krebs

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Shoulder dystocia-Still a feared complication. How can we improve?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria JeppegaardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Holbaek, Holbaek, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6297-2783
Marie H LarsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amalie B ThamsDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amalie B SchmidtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University, Hospital-Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Steen C RasmussenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Holbaek, Holbaek, Denmark.
Lone KrebsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5433-4776
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

Holbaek Hospital, Region Zealand, Denmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShoulder dystocia is a rare obstetric complication, and the risk of recurrence is important for planning future deliveries. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe objectives of our study were to estimate the incidence and risk factors for recurrence of shoulder dystocia and to identify women at high risk of recurrence in a subsequent vaginal delivery. The study design was a nationwide register-based study including data from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and National Patient Register in the period 2007-2017. Nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were included for analysis of risk factors in index and subsequent delivery.

resultsDuring the study period, 6002 cases of shoulder dystocia were reported with an overall incidence among women with vaginal delivery of 1.2%. Among 222 225 nulliparous women with vaginal births, shoulder dystocia complicated 2209 (1.0%) deliveries. A subsequent birth was registered in 1106 (50.1%) of the women with shoulder dystocia in index delivery of which 837 (77.8%) delivered vaginally. Recurrence of shoulder dystocia was reported in 60 (7.2%) with a six-fold increased risk compared with women without a prior history of shoulder dystocia (risk ratio [RR] 5.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.41 to 7.38; adjusted RR 3.06, 95% CI: 2.03 to 4.68). Low maternal height was a significant risk factor for recurrence of shoulder dystocia. In the subsequent delivery, significant risk factors for recurrence were birthweight >4000 g, positive fetal weight difference exceeding 250 g from index to subsequent delivery, stimulation with oxytocin and operative vaginal delivery. In the subsequent pregnancy following shoulder dystocia, women who underwent a planned cesarean (n = 176) were characterized by more advanced age and a higher prevalence of diabetes in the subsequent pregnancy. Furthermore, they had more often experienced operative vaginal delivery, severe perineal lacerations, and severe neonatal complications at the index delivery.

conclusionsThe incidence of shoulder dystocia among nulliparous women with vaginal delivery was 1.0% with a 7.2% risk of recurrence in a population where about 50% had a subsequent birth and of these 78% had subsequent vaginal delivery. Important risk factors for recurrence were low maternal height, increase of birthweight ≥250 g from index to subsequent delivery and operative vaginal delivery.

Indexed as

RecurrenceRegistriesShoulder DystociaAdultCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornPregnancyRisk Factorsintrapartumobstetric risk factorsrecurrenceshoulder dystociasubsequent delivery

Identifiers

PMID38409800
PMCPMC11426220
OpenAlexW4392196889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.