ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
LAMA: Lesion-Aware Mixup Augmentation for Skin Lesion Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Accurately Detecting Skin Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- EASNet: Edge-aware Segmentation Network for Skin Lesion Segmentation with Boundary-aware and Frequency Attention Mechanisms.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning can exceed dermatologists' diagnostic accuracy in experimental image environments. However, inaccurate segmentation of images with multiple skin lesions can be seen with current methods. Thus, information present in multiple-lesion images, available to specialists, is not retrievable by machine learning. While skin lesion images generally capture a single lesion, there may be cases in which a patient's skin variation may be identified as skin lesions, leading to multiple false positive segmentations in a single image. Conversely, image segmentation methods may find only one region and may not capture multiple lesions in an image. To remedy these problems, we propose a novel and effective data augmentation technique for skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopic images with multiple lesions. The lesion-aware mixup augmentation (LAMA) method generates a synthetic multi-lesion image by mixing two or more lesion images from the training set. We used the publicly available International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) 2017 Challenge skin lesion segmentation dataset to train the deep neural network with the proposed LAMA method. As none of the previous skin lesion datasets (including ISIC 2017) has considered multiple lesions per image, we created a new multi-lesion (MuLe) segmentation dataset utilizing publicly available ISIC 2020 skin lesion images with multiple lesions per image. MuLe was used as a test set to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Our test results show that the proposed method improved the Jaccard score 8.3% from 0.687 to 0.744 and the Dice score 5% from 0.7923 to 0.8321 over a baseline model on MuLe test images. On the single-lesion ISIC 2017 test images, LAMA improved the baseline model's segmentation performance by 0.08%, raising the Jaccard score from 0.7947 to 0.8013 and the Dice score 0.6% from 0.8714 to 0.8766. The experimental results showed that LAMA improved the segmentation accuracy on both single-lesion and multi-lesion dermoscopic images. The proposed LAMA technique warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.