Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409487›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Treatments in the United States.

Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Alpesh N Amin, Robert L Gottlieb, Andre C Kalil, Vishnudas Sarda, Mark Berry, Gina Brown, Jason F Okulicz, Chidinma Chima-Melton

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Essy MozaffariGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Aastha ChandakCertara, New York, NY, USA.
Alpesh N AminUniversity of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Robert L GottliebBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andre C KalilUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Vishnudas SardaCertara, Secunderabad, India.
Mark BerryGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Gina BrownGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Jason F OkuliczGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Chidinma Chima-MeltonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, UCLA Health System, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. chadchima@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-9871
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USBaylor University Medical Center · USCertara (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRacial and ethnic disparities in patient outcomes following COVID-19 exist, in part, due to factors involving healthcare delivery. The aim of the study was to characterize disparities in the administration of evidence-based COVID-19 treatments among patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

methodsUsing a large, US hospital database, initiation of COVID-19 treatments was compared among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between May 2020 and April 2022 according to patient race and ethnicity. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the effect of race and ethnicity on the likelihood of receiving COVID-19 treatments, stratified by baseline supplemental oxygen requirement.

resultsThe identified population comprised 317,918 White, 76,715 Black, 9297 Asian, and 50,821 patients of other or unknown race. There were 329,940 non-Hispanic, 74,199 Hispanic, and 50,622 patients of unknown ethnicity. White patients were more likely to receive COVID-19 treatments, and specifically corticosteroids, compared to Black, Asian, and other patients (COVID-19 treatment: 87% vs. 81% vs. 85% vs. 84%, corticosteroids: 85% vs. 79% vs. 82% vs. 82%). After covariate adjustment, White patients were significantly more likely to receive COVID-19 treatments than Black patients across all levels of supplemental oxygen requirement. No clear trend in COVID-19 treatments according to ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) was observed.

conclusionThere were important racial disparities in inpatient COVID-19 treatment initiation, including the undertreatment of Black patients and overtreatment of White patients. Our new findings reveal the actual magnitude of this issue in routine clinical practice to clinicians, policymakers, and guideline developers. This is crucial to ensuring equitable and appropriate access to evidence-based therapies.

Indexed as

COVID-19EthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesRacial GroupsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2United StatesWhiteCOVID-19Health disparitiesRace/ethnicityTreatments

Identifiers

PMID38409487
PMCPMC11914345
OpenAlexW4392159336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.